We have the complete Plato, from multiple manuscript sources. We have lost every published book (widely copied scroll) of Aristotle’s, but a large mass of what are perhaps transcribed lecture notes survived, barely, in a single manuscript, so that is our Aristotle. I don’t know the story of Xenophon’s manuscripts. Every other Greek philosopher survives only in fragments.
“Fragments” suggests, to me, a scrap of disintegrating
papyrus with a few words visible on it. This
piece of cloth once had an entire Sappho poem on it, but now we just have
fragments of the poem. Editors of the
poems will use brackets to set off the gaps.
With the Greek philosophers, though, the “fragments” are quotations
of now lost books found in the later books of others. Sometimes they are quotations of quotations, centuries
after the original, with a long chain of lost works in between. Sometimes they are perhaps paraphrases.
As books disappear, the secondary source becomes the primary
source. Such is the case with Lives
of the Eminent Philosophers (3rd century) by Diogenes Laertius, an
eccentric but now invaluable compilation of biography, anecdotes, and
quotations by and about dozens of Greek thinkers. Laertius is now not just a source but the
source for many philosophers.
If only it were a better book. It does not compare to Plutarch’s Parallel
Lives or Giorgio Vasari’s Lives of the Painters, both of which have
entries of high literary merit. Eminent
Philosophers often feels more like a collection of notes, the material that
could be shaped into a great book.
Diogenes has some weird little obsessions, the oddest of
which is writing poems about how philosophers died:
The story goes that, being bald, he [Ariston] suffered a sunstrike and so died. I have made fun of him in choliambs:
Why, Ariston, though old and bald,
Did you let the sun roast your brow? (etc., p. 269)
The 2018 translation by Pamela Mensch of Eminent
Philosophers is superb: notes (by James Miller), bibliography, illustrations,
the works. Not quite enough to recommend
the book as such to anyone not, like me, engaged in a crazy Greek philosophy
project.
I owe a debt to “The best books on The Presocratics recommended by Angela Hobbs,” one of many interesting entries in the Five Books
series. Hobbs is Professor of the Public
Understanding of Philosophy – what a title – at the University of Sheffield. She points to two standard books that present
the fragments of the early Greek philosophers.
One is Early Greek Philosophy by Jonathan Barnes, a
model of clarity, clearly well-tested on undergraduates. Barnes works to distinguish the words of each
philosopher from the interpretations.
Diogenes Laertius is inescapable.
The section on Thales, the first philosopher, is nine pages long, and
half of that is straight from Diogenes. It
is the great source, what can you do. I
strongly recommend the Barnes book to anyone curious.
The alternative mentioned by Hobbs is more advanced. The Presocratic Philosophers by G. S.
Kirk, J. E. Raven, and M. Schofield spends more time interpreting the texts,
which often means interpreting the sources. What does Thales mean when he says such and
such – no, what does Aristotle mean when he writes that Thales says such and
such. For some reason I am reading this book
as well, and it is already leading to a new, exhausting, epistemological
crisis. Maybe I will write about Thales
next week.
An alternative to the alternative would be to read each
thinker as an aphorist and not worry so much about the source. This is the approach taken by Guy Davenport
with Heraclitus (and with Diogenes the Cynic, a much later figure) in 7
Greeks. Heraclitus in 124 aphorisms
over thirteen pages. Maybe that is the
way to read the fragments, with the interpretation and sources in the
background. I am reading them every
which way.
Anyway, try 7 Greeks for Heraclitus or the Jonathan
Barnes book for everyone.
I am up for this and hoping i can keep up, philosophy isnt my strong point, as the modern version seems to spend an inirdinate time talking about the obvious, but having read Plato, I'm hoping for better things from the Greeks.
ReplyDeleteVery much how I feel, Clare. At least the trolley had not been invented yet, so the philosophers do not spend their time throwing fat men in front of trollies.
ReplyDeleteToday I read the surviving scraps of Parmenides and Zeno, much of it about whether more than one things exists. They argue there is just one thing, really. And nothing moves.
And I could not suppress my "How seriously am I supposed to take this" impulse.