Oedipus at Colonus by Sophocles is one of the plays that got me excited about the entire project of reading or re-reading the complete plays. The last surviving tragedy, even if it hardly recognizable as a tragedy, it provides a coherent ending to the tragic tradition. It is perhaps a play of reconciliation.
Old, blind Oedipus, led in his wanderings by his daughter
Antigone (this play precedes the events in Antigone), find himself in
the grove of the Furies, just outside of Athens. How often have the plays featured an altar as
the center of the action? We have a
slightly different holy place this time.
Oedipus realizes that this is the destined place of his death and
apotheosis. The Thebans want him back,
though, for vague oracle-related reasons.
The cursed Oedipus, near his end, is curiously transformed
into a holy object. That is what I mean
by “reconciliation.” A happy ending for Oedipus,
of all people, given that to the Greeks it is as important to die well as to
live well.
MESSENGER: But in what manner
Oedipus perished, no one of mortal men
Could tell but Theseus…
For he was taken without lamentation,
Illness or suffering; indeed his end
Was wonderful if ever mortal’s was. (150, tr. Robert Fitzgerald, in the Sophocles I University of Chicago edition)
The religious rituals preceding leading to the death of
Oedipus are described in some detail; Sophocles believed in them. The transformation of Oedipus into a cult
figure, a mystery, is the sublime core of the play, as much as it was in The
Eumenides of Aeschylus, which is an origin story: how Athens (old Sophocles,
unlike Euripides, still believes in Athens) becomes the home of the
Furies. The Furies in another aspect are
The Kindly Ones, welcoming Oedipus into their holy site and ending his
wandering.
As is often the case with ancient Greek religion, I find all
this alien but also moving.
Elsewhere in the play, for example the conflict between the
sons of Oedipus, which we saw performed in Seven Against Thebes and The
Women of Trachis, reconciliation is refused. Perhaps Antigone, in this version, succeeds
in her mission of peace, although I doubt it.
Oedipus at Colonus features many extraordinary poetic
passages, often voiced by the Chorus, like this surprising eruption of flowers in
the grove of the Furies:
Here with drops of heaven’s dews
At daybreak all the year,
The clusters of narcissus bloom,
Time-hallowed garlands for the brows
Of those great ladies whom we fear.
The crocus like a little sun
Blooms with its yellow ray… (111)
The song climaxes in a very Athenian paean to the olive
tree, “The blessed tree that never dies!”
Oedipus is given an interesting speech about entropy:
OEDIPUS: The immortal
Gods alone have neither age nor death!
All other things almighty Time disquiets.
Earth wastes away; the body wastes away;
Faith dies; distrust is born. (107)
Oedipus at Colonus was produced posthumously, in 404
BCE or perhaps 401 BCE. I prefer the earlier
date for its horrible irony, since 404 was when Athens was conquered. Many things ended in 404, including the
Peloponnesian War and Athenian democracy, so it seems fitting that Greek
tragedy ended, too, although of course it did not. The annual Dionysia continued with new plays,
all lost to us, and my understanding is that it was in the 4th century BCE that
the old plays began to be produced frequently, spreading to theaters throughout
the Greek-speaking world and eventually to us.
I borrowed a pair of 18th century prints from the
Metropolitan Museum of Art. “Oedipus
before the Temple of the Furies between his Daughters Antigone and Ismene” is
by Anton Raphael Mengs and “Oedipus at Colonus, Cursing his Son Polynices” is
by Henry Fuseli.
Next week – wait, aren’t we done? We now skip ten or twelve years and things
have changed. Comedy has changed, enough
that the last two surviving Aristophanes plays are sometimes called “Middle Comedy,”
transitioning from the Old Comedy we have been reading to the immensely popular
and influential New Comedy of Menander. Let’s
read The Assemblywomen (392 BCE) and see if we can spot the
difference. It is, as is obvious from
the title, a companion of Lysistrata and The Poet and the Women. How different can it be? It also features the Longest Word in Greek –
possibly the longest word in literature – so don’t miss that.
To anyone who has read along to this point: well done, reading all of the Greek tragedies. They are one of the foundations of literature.
ReplyDeleteI have enjoyed the journey so much , that next year shall read Greek historians, and the following year reread the dramas. Thank you for all the help along the way.
ReplyDeleteOh, and after the added on philosophy, I'm interested reading more of that. I'm batt,ing my way through Plato's "Republic"zt present, with fingers crossed that I'm not going out of my depth. I'd be grateful for any other suggestions.
ReplyDeleteThe Oedipus plays have always been alien to me; I do not understand them, nor their seeming importance to the ancient Greeks. I especially don't understand "Colonus." Oedipus is not a noble figure; he's more like Lear, or Job, still shouting about how his fate is unfair, and he never takes any of it on himself. He and his sons are all terrible and petty men, spiteful and selfish. I don't understand what, if anything, his supernatural gift to Athens is supposed to have been. There is plenty in this play about Athens being a noble city, fighting fairly on the side of righteousness, but what that's got to do with Oedipus, I have no idea.
ReplyDeleteI can see that Sophocles is doing something here with faith, all the main male characters (except Creon) introduced at temples. Everyone thinks he's doing right by the gods in one way or another, and the gods, apparently, think they should finally do right by Oedipus as a way to reward Athens somehow. But i don't get it. Is Sophocles just back where he started, everything is in the hands of the gods and there's no point trying to fight against our fate? You do you, Athens, and let Zeus sort it all out? Sophocles seems exhausted, like Oedipus, tired of the fight, ready for death, sure that he's going to a reward, a well-earned rest. Maybe that's all there is to it.
It has been a heck of a journey for me, too, of high value. Thanks for following along. The Greek historians are hard to top, but of course they were inventing the field.
ReplyDeleteI will write something about my Greek philosophy plans - maybe in December? - but The Reoublic, which I read thirty years ago, will certainly be on the list. If you can stand the aggravation of the Socratic dialogue, it is highly readable, as is Plato generally.
The "exhausted Sophocles" interpretation is quite interesting. Now he's Prospero (but definitely not Shakespeare).
I'll be looking forward to you posting about Greek philosophy.
ReplyDeleteOne of the things I didn't pick up from the tragedies in college was the extent to which they catered to their Athenian audience. I assume that's the point of the Athens stuff Scott mentions - it's as if Sophocles is saying that the last step in the whole Oedipus myth is to bless Athens going forward. And there seems to be a bit of "isn't it great that Athens is governed by a rational democracy, not like those crazy Thebans!" Not to mention, how wonderful are the olive trees! The historical context Tom mentions gives it all a sad irony.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, this is a surprisingly quiet play. Is this the first time we've seen a character die non-violently (if we can describe Oedipus' mystical death that way)? It's an odd coupling with the Chorus's bleak discussion of how terrible it is to get old: "And in the end he comes to strengthless age, abhorred by all men, without company, unfriended in that uttermost twilight where he must live with every bitter thing." Of course Oedipus' death is later described as sentimentally as anything in this tradition.
The play reminds me somewhat of Prometheus Bound, the way an apparently weakened character acts as a nexus for a variety of visitors who want different things for and of him. I'm remembering how Emily Wilson described Aeschylus' Oresteia as showing the transition from "a world of mystery to a world of history", and the journey from Prometheus Bound to Oedipus at Colonus seems to me to mirror that.
The "mystery to history" idea is good. Oedipus Rex is about the actions of the gods; Oedipus at Colonus is about the actions of humans. Oedipus is the link between the idea, and maybe his repeated "none of this was my fault" is one Greek idea of nobility, to endure despite a bitter fate. Maybe Sophocles' argument is somehow that Athens will survive despite all, even if all her allies turn their backs on her, even if she is betrayed by her own sons.
ReplyDeleteI meant to say that Oedipus himself acts as the link between the supernatural and natural aspects of the story, the place where the transition from higher to lower planes occurs. He is a doorway between the gods and the mundane.
DeleteYes, the degree to which so many plays had such clear links to some aspect of Athens has surprised me, too. But the whole world is in Yoknapatawpha County, so why not also in 5th century Athens.
ReplyDeleteI love the "mystery to history" idea, too. Oedipus, through his suffering, apparently, takes on a mystical quality that serves as some kind of transition. A lot of the "mystery" aspect of Greek religion have this quality, creating circumstances or spaces where the boundaries between the divine and human weaken.
looking forward to your thoughts on the republic! i was recently told that bakhtin considered the socratic dialogues to be the most important precursor to the modern novel, due to their being "utterly contemporaneous" (my friend's words, not bakhtin's) instead of occuring at a temporal distance. which, combined with a weary understanding of plato's incredible influence, has finally convinced me i ought to read him.
ReplyDeleteI'm piecing this Greek philosophy pseudo-readalong together. I guess I'm doing it.
ReplyDeleteSteven Moore, in The Novel: An Alternative History, Beginnings to 1600 (2010), has some interesting thoughts on the idea of Plato as a proto-novelist. He thinks Republic just barely qualifies. Nietzsche thought Republic was the beginning of the novel, which to him was a bad thing, decadence.