In case yesterday’s invitation was a bit abstract, here is my current sense of a twenty-play Elizabethan Not Shakespeare syllabus that I would like to investigate beginning next fall. I’ve read twelve of them.
Please note that almost every date below should be preceded
by “c.” A few are likely quite wrong.
Ralph Roister Doister (1552), Nicholas Udall
Gammer Gurton's Needle (1553), authorship much disputed
– start with two influential pre-Elizabethan comedies written for academic settings.
Gorbuduc (1561), Thomas Norton & Thomas Sackville
– the first English tragedy in blank verse, performed before young Queen Elizabeth.
Somewhere in the mid-1570s permanent theaters begin to
succeed, and it is tempting to see what might have been on those early stages,
but let’s jump to Marlowe, the great young innovator.
Dido, Queen of Carthage (1587), Christopher Marlowe –
not that you would know from this one, not that I remember.
Tamburlaine, Parts I & II (1587), Christopher
Marlowe – cheating a bit, putting the two plays together. Now things are starting to get good.
The Spanish Tragedy (1587), Thomas Kyd – the first
revenge tragedy, very exciting.
The Jew of Malta (1589), Christopher Marlowe
Arden of Faversham (1591), ??? – more cheating, since
this may actually be Shakespeare, not Not Shakespeare.
Or it’s Marlowe. Or anyone.
Doctor Faustus (1592), Christopher Marlowe
Edward the Second (1592), Christopher Marlowe
Selimus (1592), Robert Greene – one of many, many Tamburlaine
knockoffs. Static and dull, I assume.
The Massacre at Paris (1593), Christopher Marlowe –
Oddly, this is the only play I will mention of which I have seen a performance,
an almost hilariously gory French adaptation.
It is not a good play, but it is sure an interesting one.
The Old Wife's Tale (1593), George Peele – A parody
of a genre of fairy tale romance plays none of which are extant, meaning this
might be gibberish.
Every Man in His Humour (1598), Ben Jonson – I do not
remember this as a great play, but young Jonson is inventing a new kind of
comedy that will pay off in his later masterpieces.
The Shoemaker's Holiday (1599), Thomas Dekker – An early
“city comedy.”
Antonio's Revenge (1600), John Marston – revenge!
The Tragedy of Hoffmann (1602), Henry Chettle –
revenge!
Sejanus His Fall (1603), Ben Jonson – Ambitious Jonson
wrote a couple of serious Roman tragedies.
I remember them as weak, but I’ll give this one another chance.
A Woman Killed with Kindness (1603), Thomas Heywood –
A domestic melodrama, in case you were wondering why those were not popular in
the old days. Oh, they were.
The Malcontent (1603), John Marston – Really very
early Jacobean, but it let’s me end the list on an unusual masterpiece,
featuring one of the period’s great characters.
What was going on in that five-year gap after Marlowe’s
death in 1593? I will have to
investigate more. I know one thing. If Shakespeare, like Marlowe, had died at age
29, perhaps knifed in the same tavern fight, he would be remembered as the promising
young author of Richard III. Over
the next five years he became the greatest playwright in British history. The greatest writer? Romeo and Juliet, A Midsummer Night’s
Dream, Julius Caesar, Falstaff, his sonnets. He became the center of gravity that turns
everyone else into Not Shakespeare, into Shakespeare’s great predecessor or
disciple or rival, something defined against Shakespeare.
I am still tempted, I don’t know, by a Greatest Hits
approach, which would drop a dozen of the above and continue on into the 17th
century with Jonson’s great comedies, The Knight of the Burning Pestle, The
Atheist’s Tragedy, some selection of Thomas Middleton, those two
magnificent John Webster plays, A New Way to Pay Old Debts, ending with the
collapse of ‘Tis Pity She’s a Whore a decade before the Puritans put the
exhausted, decadent London theaters out of their misery.
A typically fine project. I’ll try to join in for a Kyd or a Marlowe if I’m still sentient when that part of the calendar year rolls around. Cheers.
ReplyDeleteIn an art house in Riga in probably 1994 I saw Edward II, a 1991 British biopic of the play, directed by Derek Jarman and starring Steven Waddington, Tilda Swinton and Andrew Tiernan. It emphasized Ted's infatuation with his favorite Gaveston. Lots of anachronisms like Tilda's Izabella smoking Marlboros and hot guys running around shirtless in black leather jackets. Speaking of gayity, Edward's soldiers are portrayed as gay rights activists. Worth watching, Jarman always was, back in the day.
ReplyDeleteAn excellent idea for a project. I hope you give Sejanus another go. I thought it was tremendous as a student, and then saw a Royal Shakespeare Company production that proved it had life as a compelling piece of theatre, not just an artefact of academic interest. Here and here some things I wrote about the play a while back.
ReplyDeleteYes, Kyd or a Marlowe, outstanding. I suppose Edward II is the best play as such of that bunch, although they all have remarkable things in them.
ReplyDeleteI have not seen the Jarman film. Maybe it will crosee my path. I love his Wittgenstein, an ideal biopic.
Mimic, thanks for the links to your Sejanus pieces. I will visit them again - when will that be - next year. Exciting!
Definitely interested in joining in for at least a few plays. My choices will likely be limited to what the local library has on hand (primarily Marlowe, I think, but as I've never read him that seems reasonable). Not Shakespeare feels very appropriate somehow for fall reading.
ReplyDeleteYes, good, Marlowe is amazing. His poetry, too. A phenomenon.
ReplyDeleteI think I will speed up schedule for the first few plays, since no one but me will want to read them. Then slow down for Marlowe and Kyd.