Wolf Solent has pressed his beautiful young wife against an ash tree, presumably as a prelude to sex, but he begins rubbing the bark:
‘Human brains! Human knots of confusion!’ he thought. ‘Why can’t we steal the calm vegetable clairvoyance of these great rooted lives?’ (Wolf Solent, “’This Is Reality,’” 356)
I have learned that it is just when writers, many writers,
write the strangest things that they really mean it. John Cowper Powys has, like any good novelist,
has a strong sense of irony, but he also has a fantastic, visionary mode that
pushes past it. As with his trees.
To step back for a moment.
The first page of A Glastonbury Romance introduces three
characters. They are:
The First Cause, which passes “a wave, a motion, a vibration”
into the soul of
A “particular human being,” John Crow (name on the next page),
a “microscopic biped” who is leaving the third-class carriage of a train,
returning to his home town just like the protagonist of Wolf Solent. He is not especially affected by
The sun, which is experiencing “enormous fire-thoughts.”
On the next page, another character is added, “the soul of
the earth.”
John Crow turns out to be not the protagonist of A
Glastonbury Romance but one of many, which is how Powys gets to 1,100
pages. But the other characters or sentient
metaphors or whatever they are recur occasionally. Powys is, among other things, a fantasy
writer, even aside from his use of the King Arthur and Holy Grail stories. His landscape, his cosmos, is full of
sentience, of which he occasionally gives me a glimpse. For example, the old trees that are in love
with each other:
As a matter of fact, although neither of these human lovers were aware of this, between the Scotch fir and that ancient holly there had existed for a hundred years a strange attraction. Night by night, since the days when the author of Faust lay dying in Weimar and those two embryo trees had been in danger of being eaten by grubs, they had loved each other… But across the leafless unfrequented field these two evergreens could lift to each other their subhuman voices and cry their ancient vegetation-cry, clear and strong; that cry which always seems to come from some underworld of Being, where tragedy is mitigated by a strange undying acceptance beyond the comprehension of the troubled hearts of men and women. (AGR, “Conspiracy,” 786, ellipses mine)
My single favorite passage in Glastonbury is also about
the language of trees:
The language of trees is even more remote from human intelligence than the language of beasts or of birds. What to these lovers [lovers again!], for instance, would the singular syllables “wuther-quotle-glug” have signified? (“The River,” 89)
John Crow, one of the lovers, has just uttered a phrase – “It
is extraordinary that we should ever have met!” – that “struck the attention of
the solitary ash tree… with what in trees corresponds to human irony” because
this is the fifth time in a hundred and thirty years that the tree has heard
the exact same phrase. Powys gives me
the details – an “old horse,” a “mad clergyman,” an “old maiden lady” to her
long-dead lover. “An eccentric fisherman
had uttered them addressing an exceptionally large chub which he had caught and
killed.”
All this the ash tree noted; but its vegetative comment thereon would only have sounded in human ears like the gibberish: wuther-quotle-glug.
That chub, or its descendant, appears again about 700 pages
later as a prophetic talking fish. I
believe the last talking fish to appear on Wuthering Expectations was the trout
in John Crowley’s Little, Big (1981).
The talking chub is in the most Crowleyish chapter, “’Nature Seems Dead,’”
about the night the of the powerful west wind, “one of the great turning points
in the life of Glastonbury.” Crowley has
put a magical, history-changing west wind into a number of his books.
I thought about writing about a marvelous antique shop Powys
describes early in A Glastonbury Romance, but I will instead finish with
one line of the description, a description of his own novels.
But it was a treasure-trove for the type of imagination that loves to brood, a little sardonically and unfastidiously perhaps, upon the wayward whims and caprices of the human spirit. (“King Arthur’s Sword,” 345)