Friday, March 4, 2022

Terrible kindly ones, come to your rest - The Eumenides by Aeschylus – Come, Furies, dance!

Here we see, in a representation likely dated fairly close to The Eumenides (458 BCE), Apollo protecting Orestes from a Fury, from the British Museum:


I know, I know, the wings:

PRIESTESS: Black, like the rags of soot that hang in a chimney,

Like bats, yet wingless.

Each of their faces a mess of weeping ulcers –

The eyes, the mouth, ulcers.  (Hughes, 152-3)

Another great bit from a minor character.  Again, I will mostly use the Ted Hughes translation for quotations, and Robert Fagles for one exception.

Orestes is pursued by the Furies for the murder of his mother.  He is defended by Apollo, and judged by Athena and a juror of Athenian citizens, who successfully end the cycle of bloodshed means of a move to a new mythic stage of civilization.

There is the first extant courtroom drama, the beginning of a genre, with a remarkable number of the pros and cons of the genre present from the beginning, the big con being the opaqueness, the arbitrariness, of the jury’s decision, and in a fate-driven ethos like this, close to rigged.

I particularly enjoy the moment when the prosecuting and defense attorney begin screaming insults – “Filthy witches – rubbish of creation” (180) – at each other.  I suspect this is an example of Athenian realism.  Audience members were thinking “That’s like when I was on the jury.”  The defense attorney tries to bribe the jurors; the prosecutor threatens them.  The core of the genre is ready to go.

The big mythic story is the old gods versus the new, the earth gods versus the sky gods, big primal forces versus human civilization, with, implicitly, the humans absorbing both into a new humanistic third era.  The Furies are underground creatures, “Made of darkness, clothed in darkness” (168), and when they lose their case they lament that:

The earth is overthrown.

Our laws are obsolete.

You younger gods

Who argue us out of court,

And rob us of what is ours –

You violate creation!  (187)

But, in a compromise, they end up living in an Athenian cave, transformed into The Kindly Ones (“Terrible kindly ones, / Come to your rest,” 197), which for them is a happy ending.  They like caves.  Everyone, old, new, and newer, claims to be following the law; everyone is following some law.

I wonder, as usual, but more so this time, what the Athenian audience was thinking.  Aeschylus did not invent this story.  The cave, the cult site, in which the former Furies lived was real, on the opposite side of the Acropolis from the Dionysian Theater where the Athenians were watching the Furies howl, argue, and dance.  Seeing these protective but ancient powers out in the open, casting their spells, must have been pretty strange. I’m switching to Fagles:

FURIES:     Come, Furies, dance! –

link arms for the dancing hand-in-hand,

now we long to reveal our art,

our terror, now to declare our right

    to steer the lives of men,

we all conspire, we dance!  (Fagles, 245)

Ted Hughes, I am sad to say, omits this passage.  His Furies do not dance.

Next week’s play is Antigone by Sophocles, a great among the greats, and a good choice for the person who has never read a Greek play.  I’m going to see what Seamus Heaney’s adaptation is like.

9 comments:

  1. Yeah, the Furies decided to compromise right after Athena threatens them with Zeus' thunderbolts.

    In Tony Harrison's uneven but very interesting translation, the defeated Furies scream, "Night! Mother! Listen, my cry: The new he-gods have robbed me of honors and made me NOTHING!" You know from Apollo's first speech, back at Delphi, how things will end for Orestes. The Furies are not going to win against Zeus and the Olympians.

    It really devolves into a lot of "Go, team Athens" at the end, too. But there at the end is also the torch, echoing the torch that opens "Agamemnon." Well done, Mr Aeschylus.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Right, the judge threatens the prosecutor! Hilarious.

    Yes, the torch. And in Fagles (not Hughes, the play ends in more dancing - "carry on the dancing, on and on!" The Oresteia really is a Gesamtkunstwerk. I wonder what was in the satyr play.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'd love to see a performance, but not a lot of chance of that in Devon. I have a friend who us Greek and she says that seeing a performance is better than reading, however, I dud enjoy the read. I'm so glad that I committed to this reading project, even as I struggle with it, but am totally engrossed and enjoying it immensely.

    ReplyDelete
  4. More than the other plays we've read so far, this has me wondering about Aeschylus, both as a person and as an authorial voice. Does he view this play as being about the triumph of the Athenian legal system? On face value that seems to be the case, but there's so much cynicism and doubletalk in this, particularly from Apollo: his claim that, by believing matricide to be worse than the murder of a spouse, the Furies are disrespecting Aphrodite; his suggestion that everything he's done is because of all-powerful Zeus; his pointing to Athena's birth directly from Zeus as evidence that mothers aren't important, a theme later reiterated by Athena herself. And Orestes comes across as smug and self-satisfied ("I don’t seek ritual purification—my hands are clean" and "O Pallas Athena, you’ve saved my house. I’d lost my homeland—now you give it back, and anyone in Greece can say, “This man is once again an Argive, occupying his father’s property""); my mind cannot help but leap to people like Kyle Rittenhouse and George Zimmerman.

    And on the flip side of the coin, the Chorus of the Furies is probably Aeschylus' best one, with tons of great lines and all sorts of imagery surrounding them that would have a director salivating with possibilities. But of course they fail in their main objective, and it's hard to know how to read their accepting of Athena's proffered consolation prize, where they get to be treated more or less as the madwoman in the attic.

    Anyway, there's a lot of food for thought in this one, but it's also quite funny. I like the Priestess looking on the Furies and deciding that they're Apollo's problem; the Chorus wanting Orestes to respond to them so they can eat him; and Athena's entrance, where she is either annoyed at being called away from the sack of Troy, or just wants to brag about her great new gifts; as well as all the stuff from during and after the trial you mention. Lastly, in light of Athena's earlier claim that she'll always side with the man, her statement that "the most precious part of all the land of Theseus will come out, a splendid throng of girls and mothers, groups of older women" to escort the Furies underground strikes me as very funny.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Devon, no. I only found one performance in Devon, "The Wasps" in 1973, in the remarkable Archive of Performances of Greek & Roman Drama.

    London, of course, has everything.

    To the friend, I would say boy does that ever depend on the performance.

    I am glad you joined in. Some great, great plays are ahead of us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I seem to get more out of each play we read. I suppose I am getting used to what seems a strange genre at first. I found it hard work at first, but as time goes on it gets easier and enjoyment deepens. These plays are ancient, yet feel modern in their emotional and ethical concerns.

      Delete
  6. dollymix, you are going to get along well with Euripides. There is a lot of room to make the tone of the play quite funny, or some mix of horror and comedy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Apollo's biological line of defense (where females aren't truly a parent, just an incubator) must have been hilarious even at the time of the original performance, injecting some comedy into the fight for Orestes' life. The Athenian audience would have known that wasn't the case, although it does seem to coincide with how Athenian women were treated. Maybe some pointed commentary from Aeschylus as well as levity? Today's equivalent would be the bumbling or drunken court-appointed lawyer who thinks he has a brilliant line of defense that ends up ticking off the judge.

    The recent Reforms of Ephialtes (passed in 461 BC, Ephialtes murdered same year, play first performed in 458 BC) reshaping what the courts could do would have still been a controversial topic. Where Aeschylus comes down on the reform isn't clear from the plays (at least to me). I'm just getting started on researching this period of time so it's still murky to me.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't know anythign abut Athenian courts. How interesting.

    I agree that the "woman as incubator" defense is outrageous on its face, lawyerism going a step to far, although it is also a step toward humanist individualism, freeing the individual from blood ties.

    ReplyDelete