We saw Sophocles and Euripides end their long careers with masterpieces, but we do not have that luck with Aristophanes. Wealth (388 BCE) is thin, scattershot, perhaps even a bit defeated or exhausted.
The conceit is as usual excellent. Plutus, the god of wealth, is freed from his
customary blindness by an ordinary Athenian citizen. As a result, Plutus can finally reward the
good and deserving rather than the wicked, although the series of skits that
make up the last half of the play become more of a satire on satiety. If everybody has everything, what
happens? The god Hermes comes begging
for help, because no one sacrifices to the gods anymore. All anyone really asked for was wealth and
now they have it.
HERMES: Oh for the ham I once guzzled!
CARION: You’re giving a ham performance right now if I ever saw one!
HERMES: Oh for the hot innards I used to love!
CARION: Got a pain in your own, have you, eh? (308, tr. Alan H. Sommerstein, Penguin Classics)
Hermes succeeds in acquiring a new role as the God of
Competitions. In a satiated world, all
that is left is leisure activities. Wealth
would have some real interest to a Marxist critic.
The long scene in which the personification of Poverty makes
her case against Wealth, and wealth, is interesting, although it is also
perhaps an example of the weakness of the late Aristophanes plays. Too static, too talky, too purely a
debate. Still, it is curious to see the
moral case for poverty:
POVERTY: You were talking about a pauper, who has absolutely nothing to live on. Poverty is quite different. It means living a thrifty life, sticking to your job, not having anything to spare but not having to go short either. (289)
Wealth produces obesity and gout, while poverty creates “lean,
wiry, wasplike men” who make good soldiers.
Unfortunately, none of this develops into anything. Gout and obesity do sound likely for the newly
wealthy main characters, but we will not see it.
All of this is a sad fantasy in that, as I mentioned last
week, Athens was poorer than it had been in generations. At the play's end, the characters
The illustration is “The Triumph of Riches” by Hans Holbein,
a preparatory 16th century drawing for a now lost painting. I believe that Plutus is the hunched figure
in the chariot, Here he is not obviously
blind, but is led by Fortune. Life, or
at least wealth, ain’t fair. Go to the Department of Graphic Arts at the Louvre to see the drawing in person.
I understand anyone who reads the last Aristophanes plays and
says “I’m done” but I still have two Menander plays on my schedule, the last barely
surviving classical Greek plays, written seventy years after the final
Aristophanes. If I judge the importance
of a text by its generation of further texts, the Menander plays are arguably
the most important plays we will read.
But really I wanted to keep going because I remember the 1972
Eric Turner version of The Girl from Samos (315 BCE) as so good. I have not read our next play, Dyskolos
(216 BCE) or The Grouch or perhaps The Misanthrope, the only play
of the entire project I had not previously read, and I think I will try the
Sheila D'Atri version. His Menander book
includes four plays, but two of them are fragments, as much Slavitt as Menander. They all require some textual help,
though. My inclusion of the two most
complete plays was a little arbitrary.
Anyway, next week, Menander’s Dsykolos.
No comments:
Post a Comment